Legal Opinion

Lemon v. Tucker

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 8, 1987No. 84 C 4021PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETZENDANNER, District Judge:

On April 14, 1987, defendant Joyce E. Tucker renewed her plea for this court to abstain from adjudicating this action. The renewed abstention request, predicated on the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), comes one week after the Supreme Court issued its newest explication of that doctrine in the much-publicized case of Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1519, 95 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987). As will be discussed, the Pennzoil case potentially expands the number of situations in which a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BombelaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  2. Alleghany Corp. v. HaaseDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Executive Art Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Anderson v. Charter Tp. of YpsilantiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Hinrichs v. GoodrichDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API