Hollingsworth v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the denial of relief under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(l)-(3) on grounds the motion was untimely. See NAFH Nat’l Bank v. Aristizabal, 117 So.3d 900, 901-02 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding motion to vacate final judgment pursuant to Rule 1.540(b)(2) and (3), on grounds bank committed fraud, “was untimely because the appellees filed it ‘more than 1 year’ after the ... final judgment”); Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding motion to vacate judgment on grounds bank misrepresented ownership of note and mortgage at the time of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dage v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Pure H20 Biotechnologies, Inc. v. MazziottiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- NAFH National Bank v. AristizabalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ernest Steele, as personal Representative of the etc. v. Pansy BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016