Legal Opinion
NAFH National Bank v. Aristizabal
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 24, 2013No. 4D13-83PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
We reverse an order setting aside a final foreclosure judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) because the motion was filed beyond the one-year time limit specified in the rule.
On February 25, 2010, an agreed final judgment of foreclosure was entered pursuant to a settlement agreement between the original lender and the appellees. The settlement agreement called for the appel-lees to comply with a payment schedule. When the appellees defaulted, the bank moved to schedule a foreclosure sale.
In December, 2011, the appellees moved to vacate the February 2010 final judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DeClaire v. YohananSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Miller v. Fortune Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Flemenbaum v. FlemenbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Bane v. BaneSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Freemon v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TD Bank, N.A. v. GraubardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Eleven Mile Road, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34995District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Vitaly Alekseyev and Irina Aleskseyev a/k/a Irina Shapiro v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Hollingsworth v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Jeffrey Hollingsworth v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.