Legal Opinion

Zucker v. Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-2460PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, District Judge.

I

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, F. Donald Zucker and Harry J. Barton, seek to bring this action against defendant, Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (hereinafter referred to as “Bell”), and defendant, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”), on behalf of themselves and purportedly as representatives of a class comprised of all rate payers of Bell. Plaintiffs summarily assert that this court has jurisdiction pursuant to “the Civil Rights Acts, the United States Constitution, particularly the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Freehold Cogeneration Associates, L.P. v. Board Of Regulatory Commissioners Of The State Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. US West, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Kalinsky v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  5. J & a REALTY v. City of Asbury ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API