J & a REALTY v. City of Asbury Park
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff, J & A Realty (“J & A”), moves to strike defenses. Defendants oppose the motion.
BACKGROUND
In 1988, the City of Asbury Park (“the city”) enacted an ordinance which established the city sewer system as a self-liquidating municipal utility. To fund its new sewer plant, the city passed a sewer ordinance which established a system for assessing property owners for sewer charges. Prior to that time, the city provided its property owners with sewer service which was billed as a part of the owner’s municipal property taxes. The new charges are based upon two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friends of Santa Fe County v. LAC Minerals, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Cameron v. Graphic Management Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- US West, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Aronson v. Creditrust Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.