Legal Opinion

J & a REALTY v. City of Asbury Park

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 18, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-4355 (JCL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIFLAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff, J & A Realty (“J & A”), moves to strike defenses. Defendants oppose the motion.

BACKGROUND

In 1988, the City of Asbury Park (“the city”) enacted an ordinance which established the city sewer system as a self-liquidating municipal utility. To fund its new sewer plant, the city passed a sewer ordinance which established a system for assessing property owners for sewer charges. Prior to that time, the city provided its property owners with sewer service which was billed as a part of the owner’s municipal property taxes. The new charges are based upon two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friends of Santa Fe County v. LAC Minerals, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
  2. Cameron v. Graphic Management Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. US West, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Aronson v. Creditrust Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API