Legal Opinion

Denver, South Park & Pacific Railway Co. v. Riley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

Appellee brought this action in the court below to recover from appellant a balance claimed to be due for grading seven sections of its railroad. This work was done under a written contract, similar in form to those generally adopted in like cases. Among other provisions in this contract is the following:

“And it is further agreed, that, in case any disputes or differences shall arise between the'.company and contractor, as to the construction or meaning of the agree-*495merit and specifications, or sufficiency of the performance of any work to he done under it, or price to he paid, all such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McMahon v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Smith v. BriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Vanderwerker v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Williams v. VandiverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Union Pac. R. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Dutton & Kendall Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API