Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 2010No. 1 CA-CR 08-0230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 Clifton Bert Young was convicted by a jury on one count of computer tampering, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-2316(A)(7) and a class six undesignated felony. The trial court suspended sentencing and placed Young on probation for eighteen months. On appeal, Young argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We agree and reverse.

¶ 2 A.R.S. § 13-2316(A)(7) (2001) prohibits a person from acting without or in excess of authority to obtain any “records that are not public records” from a state computer. The evidence presented at trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. HallmanArizona Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MohajerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State v. HannahCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State of Arizona v. Hesam MohajerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API