State v. Hannah
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Judge:
¶ 1 In this appeal, we consider whether, by submitting ballots in both Arizona and Colorado’s November 2010 elections, Carol Hannah “[kjnowingly vote[d] more than once at any election” in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 16-1016(2). 1 Because the State was required to prove Hannah east more than one vote in a single election, and failed to present sufficient evidence to establish this fact, we reverse her conviction and remand for entry of a judgment of acquittal.
FACTS 2 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In October 2013, a grand jury returned an indictment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Foster v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Washington v. James Anthony PadrtaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026