Legal Opinion

State v. Hannah

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 28, 2015No. 1 CA-CR 14-0424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Judge:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we consider whether, by submitting ballots in both Arizona and Colorado’s November 2010 elections, Carol Hannah “[kjnowingly vote[d] more than once at any election” in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 16-1016(2). 1 Because the State was required to prove Hannah east more than one vote in a single election, and failed to present sufficient evidence to establish this fact, we reverse her conviction and remand for entry of a judgment of acquittal.

FACTS 2 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In October 2013, a grand jury returned an indictment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Foster v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Washington v. James Anthony PadrtaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API