Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Noah

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1891No. 12999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco dismissing a petition for a family allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the decision rendered upon.the former appeal, reported in 73 Cal. 583.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

Most of the questions involved in this case were considered and passed upon in the case of the same title reported in 73 Cal. 583. It is now further shown that one of the executors of Joel Noah’s will, William M. Morris, died on the 1st of October, 1887; that the two surviving executors proceeded to settle up the estate; that on the 29th of November, 1887, they presented and filed their final account, with a petition *469praying that the account be settled and the estate in their hands be distributed; that on the 12th of December following, after due and regular notice, the matter came…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In re Berner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Slotnikow v. ShaperoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hilton v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API