Legal Opinion
In Re DM
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 2003No. 22563, 22564, 22565PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
661 N.W.2d 768 (2003)
2003 SD 49
In the Interest of D.M., R.M., III, and T.B.C., Minor Children and Concerning R.M., Jr. and S.B.C.-M., Parents and Respondents.
In the Interest of B.B.C., Minor Child, and Concerning L.M.L. and S.B.C.-M., Parents and Respondents.
Nos. 22563, 22564, 22565.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs April 16, 2003.
Decided April 30, 2003.
Rehearing Granted June 9, 2003.
Lawrence E. Long, Attorney General, Ann M. Holzhauser, Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for appellee State of South Dakota.
Patrick M. Ginsbach of Farrell, Farrell &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People in the Interest of EdjSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- People in Interests of MCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Human Services Department v. Wayne R.N.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- In re J.L.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- In re A.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Interest of D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Interest of D.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004