Legal Opinion

Kana v. Fishman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 25, 1931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff brought her bill in equity under G. L. c. 175, § 113, as amended by St. 1923, c. 149, § 2, which authorizes a judgment creditor who has suffered loss or damage on account of bodily injury or of damage to property, to compel the application to the judgment of insurance money due to the judgment debtor if, at the accrual of the cause of action, the debtor was insured against liability for such loss. She had recovered judgment against the defendant Fishman for injury received in January, 1927, and sought to compel payment out of insurance claimed to be due to Fishman from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Rollins v. Bay View Auto Parts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Daly v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Lunt v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Warecki v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Sontag v. GalerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API