Holmes v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Robert Holmes, Jr. appeals from an order denying post-conviction relief 1 contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict; (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence of another crime and ruled that he could be impeached with his prior convictions if he testified; (3) he was denied a fair trial when the trial court read his aliases to the jury and commented on a juror’s failure to vote; (4) he was entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; and (5) he was improperly sentenced. We affirm but…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MoormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993