Tipton v. Tipton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Warren District Court. — Hon. W. H. Fahey, Judge. Both parties assert they are entitled to a decree divorcing them, each charging the other with wilful desertion. The trial court denied all relief to both. The plaintiff, the wife, alone appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
1. Divouce: husband and wife: living apart by agreement: severance of relation: desertion. I. Though defendant responds to the allegation of plaintiff that the parties lived together until October, 1910, by answering that plaintiff never did live with him, and though we concede they did not “live together,” as husband and wife ordinarily do, we have no occasion to give these contentions and the departure of the parties from the standard marital relation any exhaustive consideration. Whatsoever they did or failed to do before October was on mutual arrangement, and for mutual convenience, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kupka v. KupkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Wright v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by21 opinions
- Love v. LoveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Paulsen v. PaulsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Adkison v. AdkisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Hite v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.