Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 20, 2025No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE AND vs. DENYING MOTION TO STAY OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. BACKGROUND In April of 2023, defendant, Omega, moved to compel plaintiff, Buergofol, to respond to Requests for Production (RFPs) 23 and 24. Docket 92. Buergofol opposed the motion, arguing that disclosure would improperly require Buergofol to reveal trade secret information. Docket 105 at 9. The motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 37.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Remington Arms Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Taiyo International, Inc. v. Phyto Tech Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Hartman v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992