Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Remington Arms Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 13, 1992No. 90-4074-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

The Court has completed its review of the documents submitted in camera and the briefs concerning plaintiff’s original motion to compel production of documents. This issue came before the Court on remand from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. In re Remington Arms Co., Inc., 952 F.2d 1029 (8th Cir.1991). After review of the matter, the Court rules that Remington Arms Co., Inc. shall produce the documents specified in Appendix A under the safeguard of a protective order.

Defendant Remington Arms Co., Inc. presents two arguments for the Court to find…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  2. In Re Remington Arms Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. A.B. Chance Co. v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapa v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
  3. Chapa v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Chapa v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API