Legal Opinion

State v. Haislip

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 2, 1983No. 54,685PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an appeal from a conviction for murder in the first degree (K.S.A. 21-3401), and aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer (K.S.A. 21-3415). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The facts reveal Officers Paul Garofalo and Randy Mullikin of the Wichita Police Department were on routine vehicular patrol in the early morning hours of November 8, 1980. At 3:30 a.m. they were proceeding west on 9th Street. Garofalo was the driver. They passed through the intersection of 9th and Washington and stopped one-half block west where they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. OteroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. State v. FinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State v. Cuezze, Houston & FalticoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HaislipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. State v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. State v. JamisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API