Legal Opinion
Clogston v. Schiff-Lang Co., Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1935No. L. A. 12798PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in the case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One. Upon further consideration we adopt the opinion of Mr. Justice Houser as the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:
“Among the provisions of a contract that was entered into between plaintiff and defendant was the following:
“ ‘Any differences arising between the parties of this contract shall be settled by arbitration, and buyer shall accept goods with such allowance or award as shall be determined by such arbitration, each shipment to be considered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- In re the Arbitration between American Eagle Fire Insurance & New Jersey InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Matter of A.E. Fire Ins. Co. v. N.J. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Charles J. Rounds Co. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42California Supreme Court · 1971
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing WorkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.