Bonnarjee v. Pike
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, to recover from the defendants, also husband and wife, the sum of three thousand dollars as damages resulting from an exchange of properties by the respective parties, brought about by the aid of false representations on the part of the agent who negotiated the transaction. Judgment went for plaintiffs in the sum demanded, and the defendants appeal.
The appellants make several contentions in support of their appeal, among them being that the evidence is insufficient to show that the agent in the transaction was in fact the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Crandall v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Riser v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Holley v. JacksonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
- Proctor v. ArakelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Holley v. JacksonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
- McKeever v. Locke-Paddon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.