Legal Opinion
Martis v. Union Transport Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 2, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelby, J.:
The complaint was drawn so that it might be brought within the purview of the old Employers’ Liability Act, which was formerly section 200 et seq. of the Labor Law of 1909 (as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 352; now Employers’ Liability Law of 1921, § 2 et seq.) The complaint alleges the giving of a notice under that act, and it pleads the negligence of the defendant, its agents and servants, and one of the persons engaged in the service of the defendant, and intrusted with authority “ to direct, control or command ” the plaintiff; the latter words being the words of the statute.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Montezuma Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Woodworth v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932