Legal Opinion

Colonial Stores Incorporated v. Scholz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1945No. 31042PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Was the petition subject to the general demurrer? The petition did not allege how long the cardboard and the other foreign substances had been on the floor, nor that they had been there for a sufficient length of time to constitute constructive notice to the defendant of their presence there. Therefore the petition failed to charge that the defendant had constructive notice of the defects on the floor. That being true, did the petition allege that the defendant had actual knowledge of such defects? It did not do so directly, but it did allege that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thurman v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Etheridge Motors, Inc. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Lenkeit v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. MacOn Academy Music Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Madaris v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API