Joe Bradley Smith and Myron Parker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from conviction, of the crime commonly known as bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). 1 It challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish two elements of the crime: (1) the taking and carrying away of property; (2) the victim’s lack of consent to-the taking.
The government’s principal witness was a teller at the Bank of Nevada at Las Vegas, Nevada. He testified that he had known both appellants; that Parker had been a fellow employee at the Bank of Nevada and that he had known Smith when both of them had worked at a Reno bank. The evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Loney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Hite v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Rutkowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Davis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. WishamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Burwell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.