Burwell v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Melvin J. Burwell appeals his conviction for theft, a class D felony,1 claiming insufficiency of the evidence.
We affirm.
Burwell was brought to trial on two charges of theft arising from two separate incidents. Count I was dismissed pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 41(B). We need not accept the State's invitation to consider the evidence submitted on that count, which the State describes as evidence of a common scheme or plan, in order to determine that the conviction for Count II was warranted. The evidence of record for Count II, standing alone, is sufficient.
Th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- LaMar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Holtel v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Trinkle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989