Legal Opinion

Broom v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 1985No. 0215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Goolsby, Judge:

This action for breach of a construction contract was initiated by the respondent Robert D. Broom against the appellants Allen Marshall, Colonel 0. Rogers, and John Taylor, individually, and against the defendant Columbia Architectural Group, Inc. The issues presented on appeal are whether the trial court erred in failing to grant appellants’ motions for a directed verdict and for judgment non obstante ver dicto (n.o.v.) and whether the jury verdict was excessive so as to indicate passion, prejudice, or caprice.

We hold that the trial court erred as a matter of law in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Chitwood v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Mylin v. Allen-White Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Skipper v. HartleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Don Swann Sales Corp. v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Thompson v. WAYNE SMITH CONST. CO., INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Threatt-Michael Construction Co. v. C & G ElectricCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API