Marshall C. Sasser v. The Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
The primary issue in this petition for review is whether a person who is charged in an administrative complaint with discharging pollutants into the waters of the United States is entitled to be tried by a jury. Dr. Marshall C. Sasser seeks to set aside a final order of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency assessing Class II penalties for reimpounding freshwater tidal wetlands without a permit. 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a). Dr. Sasser complains that the Administrator lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his case, that the administrative…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Jarkesy v. SECCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Benham v. Ozark Materials River Rock, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ReavesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.