Legal Opinion

Christy v. Carlisle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1978No. 9815PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This appeal is from an order of the district court setting aside a default judgment in an action to recover damages arising out of a four-car automobile accident. Suit was commenced shortly before the two-year limitation period expired and named Theresa Carlisle as defendant along with fictitiously named defendants.

The insurance carrier for Carlisle was promptly notified by plaintiff’s counsel of the lawsuit and was advised by letter that it had an indefinite extension of time to answer “subject to my advising you that we have served Ms. Carlisle.” Subsequent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Charlton L. Davis & Company, P. C. v. Fedder Data Center, Inc., Financial Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Hotel Last Frontier Corp. v. Frontier Properties, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Feeney v. AbdelahadMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Reno Raceway, Inc. v. Sierra Paving, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Abreu v. GilmerNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McNair v. RiveraNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Roso v. HenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Franklin v. Bartsas Realty, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Svard v. BarfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API