Feeney v. Abdelahad
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
It was an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to deny the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment which had been entered after his default and without notice to him or his attorney of the hearing on the assessment of damages. Assuming, without deciding, that the request by the de*850fendant’s attorney to the plaintiff’s attorney for an extension of time to file an answer did not constitute an appearance within the meaning of Mass.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2), 365 Mass. 822 (1974),1 nevertheless the plaintiff had no "right” to have the crucial hearing on damages proceed without notice to the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Port-Wide Container Co. v. Interstate Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. WalshMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Jabaily v. CullenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Christy v. CarlisleNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- MPV, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Continental Data Corp. v. Old Colony Group Leasing, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.