Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Two sets of Plaintiffs, the “RMFU Plaintiffs”2 and the “AFPM Plaintiffs,”3 challenge the constitutionality of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”), Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 17, §§ 75480-90. Defendants4 move to dismiss all four claims in the RMFU Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), Doc. 374. Doc. 378. Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings on the AFPM Plaintiffs’ claims in their Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Doc. 373, concerning the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Fuel & Petrochemical v. Jane O'KeeffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018