Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cardisco v. Davis, Warden of State Prison

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. Nos. 5853, 5854Published

1ConcurrenceFolland, Justice

If the good conduct statute be construed as mandatory, thereby curtailing or controlling the discretion of the Board of Pardons, then I would concur with Mr. Justice MOFFAT that such legislation is an unauthorized intrusion by the Legislature into a field wherein the Board of Pardons has exclusive power under the Constitution. However, I am impressed with the view that such was not the legislative intent or purpose, but that the statute was intended as directory only and not mandatory. I think this becomes evident when we construe the present statutes in the light of their history and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Mutart v. PrattUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Bishop v. State Board of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Connors v. PrattUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In Re DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API