Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bishop v. State Board of Corrections

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Application for writ of prohibition by the state, on the relation of A. C. Bishop, attorney general, against the state board of corrections and its members. No briefs were filed.

1Opinion of the Court

Zane, C. J.:

TMs is an application for a writ, upon the information of the attorney general, prohibiting the defendants from paroling certain convicts serving terms in the state prison. It is alleged by the plaintiff that the defendants are about to release the prisoners named, in pursuance of the following sections of the revised statutes of this state: “The board shall have power to establish rules and regulations, under which any prisoner, who is now or hereafter may be imprisoned under a sentence other than for murder in the first or second degree, and who may have served a minimum term…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Labrum v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  5. People Ex Rel. Smith v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API