Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barlow v. Utah Light & Traction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1931No. 4819Published

1DissentFolland, J.

I dissent. Being unable to concur in the result reached in the prevailing opinion, I feel under the. necessity of stating my reasons.

The accident occurred at about 2 o’clock in the afternoon. At that time it was snowing. There were icy ruts 6 to 8 inches in depth in the street and which had been in the street for several days prior to the accident. Plaintiff was traveling north on the east side of Seventh East street driving a Chevrolet coupe in good condition, with chains on the wheels, efficient brakes, and automatic windshield wiper. The window on the driving or left side of the car was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Spiking v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Willis v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API