Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goo Yee v. Rosenberg

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1913Published

Exceptions erom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OP

ROBERTSON, C.J.

I think there is nothing to be gained by a re-trial of this case. The essential facts of the case are uncontradicted and either the plaintiff or the defendant should have judgment according to what the law is as applied to those facts. The story is a simple one. The defendant informed the United States district attorney that a Chinaman had expressed a desire to buy somfe-opium. The district attorney furnished the defendant three tins of contraband opium to sell to the plaintiff in order that he might be caught and arrested upon a charge of violating the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bigby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. National Trust Co. v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. National Bank & Loan Co. v. PetrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Stewart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API