Legal Opinion

Quality & Ruskin Associates v. London

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 22, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order modified by providing that the branch of landlord’s motion which sought leave to take the deposition of occupant upon oral examination is granted and by providing that the denial of the branch of landlord’s motion seeking leave to require the production of various documents is without prejudice to renewal upon an application appropriately tailored to the material issues; as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

The issues in this licensee summary proceeding (RPAPL 713 [7]) concern an expired rent-stabilized lease and an occupant who alleges the creation of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. J.D. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. New York University v. FarkasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  3. MMB Associates v. DayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Lonray, Inc. v. NewhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Nineteen New York Properties Ltd. Partnership v. 535 5th Operating Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas Jefferson Owners Corp. v. Lokshin, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2024
  2. Front Street Restaurant Corp. v. CiolliAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  3. Trustees of Columbia Univ. of the City of N.Y. v. Montgomery, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API