Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Byrd v. MorEquity, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2012No. 2100734Published

1ConcurrencePittman, Judge

I agree that the summary judgment in favor of MorEquity, Inc., is due to be reversed and the cause remanded because MorEquity failed to establish that there was no factual dispute as to whether it was the assignee of the mortgage before it initiated the foreclosure proceedings against the Byrds. In my judgment, that failure simply means that MorEquity did not make a prima facie showing that it could satisfy one of the elements of its ejectment claim, not that MorEquity failed to demonstrate that it had standing to sue.

I believe that this case and others like it, see, e.g., Ex parte McKinney,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Sanchez v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte Howell Engineering and Surveying, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API