Legal Opinion
Steinwender v. The Mexican Prince
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge., The above three libels (consolidated) were filed to recover $36,500 damages to 963 bags of coflee, part of the cargo of the steamship Mexican Prince, shipped at the way port of Rio Janeiro, upon a voyage from Buenos Ayres to New York, in *485May, 1895. TUo damage was done by water, which was carried in Wo. 2 tank oí llie skip, and which through some neglect of proper attention to a Tabre in the pipe line connecting -with starboard tank Wo. 8, in which all the damaged coffee was stowed, escaped into that compartment. There is no dispute as to the damage, or that it came…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Red Cross LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- American Sugar-Refining Co. v. SandfieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1897
- Franklin Sugar-Refining Co. v. SilviaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- The British KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1898
- Jay Wai Nam v. Anglo-American Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- The ManitouDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
- Commerce Oil Corporation v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., Owner of Barge the Dxe-78Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Daisy Philippine Underwear Co. v. United States Steel Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.