Legal Opinion

State v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 26, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Three individuals and two corporations were convicted upon a consolidated trial of six .indictments of violations of the Oregon Subdivision Control Law, ① and sentenced as misdemeanants to pay fines and abide by special conditions. They appeal. Former ORS 92.230 (1), the prohibitory section of that law, provides:

“No person shall offer any subdivided lands for sale or lease * * * without having complied with all the applicable provisions of ORS 92.210 to 92.390.”

The indictments are all in similar form. A typical one charges the basic violation and then specifies the alleged failures of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MontiethOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. TruxallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Montieth v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Oregon State Bar v. FowlerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Quiriconi v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API