Legal Opinion

Mischenko v. Gowton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1982No. 2056PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from a dismissal of a petition to strike or open a default judgment. The issue before us is whether a lack of proper service, in the face of actual notice can excuse a failure to promptly file a petition to open. Although this issue was raised before it, the lower court failed to reach this argument. It appears this was due to the trial court not considering part of the contents of the record, namely the deposition. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is appellant’s contention that since she never received proper service of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollinger v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Cooper & Reese, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Vaughn v. LoveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Neff v. Tribune Printing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Keystone Wire & Iron Works, Inc. v. Van Cor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. U.K. LaSalle, Inc. v. LawlessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Dubrey v. IzaguirreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Grady, F. v. Nelson, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API