Legal Opinion

Butinetz v. Hohnhorst

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided March 10, 1998No. 95-CV-3664Published

1Opinion of the Court

MINORA, J.,

This matter is before the court by way of plaintiff’s motion for post-trial relief pursuant to Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. Following a jury trial in June of 1997, the jury concluded that the defendant, Woodrow Hohnhorst, was negligent, but his negligence was not a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff’s, Michael Butinetz’s, harm. As a result, the jury awarded zero damages despite the plaintiff claiming injuries as a result of the accident. The plaintiff has petitioned for a new trial.

The plaintiff, Michael Butinetz, has requested post-trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Ditz v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Lewis v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Gallagher v. MarguglioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API