Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dawson v. Lanham

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1971No. 5191Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

ABE, J.

The majority of this court holds that after the Circuit Court quashed the indictments, the defendants may continue to be held in jail under the indictments for their failure to make bail. I disagree.

*84The State did not have the right to appeal an order or judgment quashing an indictment until the enactment of Act 37, SLH 1931, which is now HRS § 641-12.

It is a well-settled rule that the legislature may define and limit the right of appeal because the remedy of appeal is not a common law right and it exists only by authority of statutory or constitutional provisions.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Levy v. KimballHawaii Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API