Dawson v. Lanham
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
ABE, J.
The majority of this court holds that after the Circuit Court quashed the indictments, the defendants may continue to be held in jail under the indictments for their failure to make bail. I disagree.
*84The State did not have the right to appeal an order or judgment quashing an indictment until the enactment of Act 37, SLH 1931, which is now HRS § 641-12.
It is a well-settled rule that the legislature may define and limit the right of appeal because the remedy of appeal is not a common law right and it exists only by authority of statutory or constitutional provisions.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Levy v. KimballHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.