Legal Opinion

United States v. York

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 25, 2000No. ACM 33239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHLEGEL, Senior Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of wrongfully using cocaine. Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Court members sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-1. The convening authority approved “forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month until the bad-conduct discharge is executed[.]” We find no errors and affirm.

Appellant alleges the approval of forfeitures of $617.00 pay per month until the bad-conduct discharge is executed violates Rule for Courts-Martial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. JobeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. FriersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ShermanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. CrazeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API