Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Jack

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1945No. Civ. Nos. 781, 786PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

The complaints, in two counts, are identical in phraseology except as to dates of alleged violations. Motions by defendants in each case are the same. The complaint against Percy Jack is used to illustrate. The first count, requesting a restraining order, reads as follows:

“1. In the judgment of the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, the defendant has engaged in acts and practices which constitute violations of Section 4(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., as amended, hereinafter called the ‘Act’, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Bowles v. JacobsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. SigelDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  2. Porter v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
  3. Sprague v. Liberty Mutual Ins. C o .District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API