Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Pucci

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-1092PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

I

Nature of the Dispute

Peter Pucci and Carmella Scalese Pucci resided in a single-family dwelling at 249 Merchant Street in Ambridge, Pennsylvania from the time of their marriage in 1932 until February 21,1979. On the latter date, a natural gas explosion in an adjacent building caused extensive blast and fire damage to the Puccis’ residence. Since the accident, the Puccis have lived with their daughter and son-in-law.

The Puccis had insured their residence against loss from fire through a homeowner’s policy issued by Commercial Union Assurance Company. The basic…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Scooper Dooper, Inc. v. Kraftco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Linnen v. ArmainisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. Bailey, Jo Ellen v. Ness, J. Christian, Individually Garber, Daniel, Individually and Northern Regional Police DeptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Georgia Webb v. Sue Ann Martin Voirol, Helen A. Martin v. Sue Ann Martin VoirolCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API