Legal Opinion
Scooper Dooper, Inc. v. Kraftco Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 26, 1974No. 73-1836PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Scooper Dooper, Inc., requests that this Court undertake a full-scale analysis of the antitrust implications of a qualified refusal to deal by Kraftco Corporation. Considerations of proper judicial administration require us to decline the invitation to measure Kraftco’s conduct against the proscriptions of the Sherman Act. On the basis of collateral estoppel, we affirm the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Kraftco.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant-appellee Kraftco (formerly National Dairy Products) manufactures and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Oburn v. ShappCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- John MacKey v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Mike Oldham, Charles J. Oldham and Rona Oldham v. Margaret Ann PritchettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Ramallo Bros. Printing, Inc. v. El Día, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.