Legal Opinion

Brayley v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Humboldt Oirouit Gourt. Action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

The conceded facts are that the defendant Ellis, in February, 1882, executed a mortgage to the defendant Colby to secure two negotiable promissory notes. The notes were sold and assigned by Colby to the plaintiff before maturity, but no assignment of the mortgage was made of record or otherwise. The defendant Fuller purchased the property of Ellis. The defendants claim that Ellis paid *156Colby $150 in part payment of the notes, without knowledge of the transfer to the 'plaintiff, and under the belief that Colby still owned both the notes and mortgage. They claim that Colby so stated and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of the State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Baumgartner v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Newhall Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Kernohan v. DurhamOhio Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API