Legal Opinion

City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation & Division of Tax Appeals

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 25, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weinteaub, C. J.

The City of Passaic attacks the apportionment of the cost of county government among the municipalities for the year 1956. It urges the statute does not authorize the inclusion of the assessed value of personal property in the apportionment basis. It adds that if this view be rejected the statute is unconstitutional. The county board found against the city and the Division of Tax Appeals affirmed. On our motion we certified the city’s further appeal to the Appellate Division before it was considered there.

The city complains that whereas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lane v. HoldermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Borough of Sayreville v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. FACEBOOK, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN RE THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ETC. (1527-CDW-21 AND 1311-CDW-21, ATLANTIC AND MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2022
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API