Legal Opinion

Cockman v. State Farm Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1993No. 92-1308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), brought suit for a judgment declaring that it did not owe its insured’s attorney an attorney’s fee for his efforts in settling its insured’s claim for property damages against the tortfeasor. The case was submitted to the trial court, sitting without a jury, on stipulated facts. The trial court declared that the insured’s attorney was not entitled to a fee from State Farm under the facts presented. We find no error and affirm.

Appellant, Cheryl Cockman, suffered personal injuries and property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. HammettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. of Fort Worth v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guiel v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API