United States v. Dorlette
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS [Doc. # 14]
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendant Faroulh Dorlette was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). He moves to suppress, as the product of an unlawful search and seizure, a revolver found in his possession on the night of December 24, 2008. The Court held an evidentiary hearing at which four people — the two officers at the scene as well as two of the individuals with Dorlette that night (Dominique Narcisse and Niahson Letang) — testified. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ColyarIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. BristolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011