Legal Opinion
Bolling v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided June 19, 1996No. 96-0005-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN M. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
In this personal injury action premised upon the alleged negligent installation of a radiator hose, defendant Montgomery Ward & Co., Ine. (“Montgomery Ward”) moves for summary judgment. The motion is granted.
ANALYSIS
Plaintiff Lee Bolling (“Bolling”) alleges that employees of Montgomery Ward negligently installed a radiator hose into a truck in which he was a passenger. Radiator hoses come in a wide variety of configurations. The one in question here had a 90-degree bend at one end and a 20-degree bend at the other. The hose was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Tyco Fire Products LPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011