Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Roden

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 28, 2014No. 13-1394PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

The Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause guarantees that no citizen will be excluded from jury service solely on account of his or her race. This logical proposition, bordering on the obvious, was enshrined as a matter of clearly established constitutional law in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Indeed, “[t]he Constitution forbids striking [from the jury] even a single prospective juror for a discriminatory purpose.” Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 U.S. 472, 478, 128 S.Ct. 1203, 170 L.Ed.2d 175 (2008) (quoting United States v.…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Hernandez Lara v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Garner v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Linton v. SabaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API