Legal Opinion
A. Soloff & Son, Inc. v. Asher
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 9, 1984No. 82 Civ. 1981 (MEL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
The Trustees of the Amalgamated Cotton Garment and Allied Industries Fund (“the Fund”) earlier moved for summary judgment on their counterclaim that because A. Soloff & Son, Inc. (“Soloff”) had failed timely to request arbitration under the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(1), it was subject to withdrawal liability under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §. 1381 et seq. In an earlier opinion at 583 F.Supp. 1098 (1984), we held that Soloff had not sought arbitration timely under the Act. We deferred the entry of a judgment for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- A. Soloff & Son, Inc. v. Trustees of the Amalgamated Cotton Garment & Allied Industries FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tiger v. AT & T Technologies Plan for Employees' Pensions, Disability BenefitsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Rao v. Prest MetalsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Nebraska ex rel. Nelson v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste CommissionDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993
- A. Soloff & Son, Inc. v. AsherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. CENTRAL INTERSTATEDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993