Legal Opinion

Nebraska ex rel. Nelson v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 8, 1993No. 4:CV93-3042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Pending before me are Defendants’ motions seeking summary judgment (Filings 29 and 30). After considering the briefs and evidence of the parties and hearing their oral arguments, I shall grant the motions for summary judgment, finding that (1) this action is time barred by the applicable limitations period, and (2) even if this action were not time barred by the applicable limitations period, it would be barred by the equitable doctrines of estoppel and laches.

I

A

This is another in a series of lawsuits regarding efforts to stop development of a regional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999
  2. County of Boyd v. US Ecology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Nebraska ex rel. Nelson v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. CENTRAL INTERSTATEDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993
  5. The County Of Boyd v. Us Ecology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API